• Reviewers should try to fill in all the parts of reviewers report to make a fair judgment regarding the quality of the paper.

• Reviewers should respond within stipulated time frame of two week for the journal.

• Every reviewer is supposed to be fair in reviewing and no manuscript should be reviewed which is authored, co-authored or authored by some known person/s, in order to avoid biasness.

• Any reviewer who feels him/herself as unqualified, or not having judgment idea or deficit of time should inform editor promptly, so that the paper can be forwarded elsewhere.

• As review is essential step towards publication process, the review should be objective one, and personal feelings, judgments or biasness should not affect the review and its outcomes.

• A manuscript sent for review is a confidential document, so it should be treated fairly and secretly and should not be disclosed.

• Each point should be commented clearly to make decision process of acceptance/rejection easy.

• The changes/ corrections required should also be clearly stated.

• If reviewer notices any similarity with any other paper published in any other journal, containing same contents etc. should be informed immediately to editor.

• At the time of review the reviewer must focus on Originality, Contribution to field of technical quality of research, Clarity of issues presented in the paper and depth of research.

• The reviewer can download ‘Review Form’. Click Here

• To download the 'Reviewer Information Form’. Click Here